|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Folk, Cowboys
|
143.0
|
155.0
|
131.0
|
24.0
|
10
|
vs BAL
|
|
Stephen Gostkowski, Patriots
|
134.3
|
139.0
|
129.0
|
10.0
|
4
|
vs ARI
|
|
Shayne Graham, Bengals
|
133.7
|
148.0
|
124.0
|
24.0
|
8
|
at CLE
|
|
Josh Brown, Rams
|
130.3
|
133.0
|
128.0
|
5.0
|
5
|
vs SF
|
|
Nate Kaeding, Chargers
|
129.7
|
141.0
|
123.0
|
18.0
|
9
|
at TB
|
|
Mason Crosby, Packers
|
129.3
|
138.0
|
125.0
|
13.0
|
8
|
at CHI
|
|
Phil Dawson, Browns
|
127.7
|
135.0
|
118.0
|
17.0
|
5
|
vs CIN
|
|
Adam Vinatieri, Colts
|
127.3
|
131.0
|
121.0
|
10.0
|
4
|
at JAX
|
|
Robbie Gould, Bears
|
123.7
|
138.0
|
109.0
|
29.0
|
8
|
vs GB
|
|
Rob Bironas, Titans
|
122.3
|
126.0
|
120.0
|
6.0
|
6
|
vs PIT
|
|
Neil Rackers, Cardinals
|
118.0
|
122.0
|
114.0
|
8.0
|
7
|
at NE
|
|
Josh Scobee, Jaguars
|
117.7
|
119.0
|
116.0
|
3.0
|
7
|
vs IND
|
|
Kris Brown, Texans
|
116.7
|
117.0
|
116.0
|
1.0
|
8
|
at OAK
|
|
Jeff Reed, Steelers
|
115.7
|
126.0
|
108.0
|
18.0
|
6
|
at TEN
|
|
Jason Hanson, Lions
|
114.0
|
116.0
|
113.0
|
3.0
|
4
|
vs NO
|
|
David Akers, Eagles
|
111.0
|
112.0
|
110.0
|
2.0
|
74
|
at WAS
|
|
Shaun Suisham, Redskins
|
110.7
|
113.0
|
109.0
|
4.0
|
10
|
vs PHI
|
|
Lawrence Tynes, Giants
|
110.7
|
121.0
|
99.0
|
22.0
|
4
|
vs CAR
|
|
Matt Stover, Ravens
|
110.0
|
117.0
|
106.0
|
11.0
|
10
|
at DAL
|
|
Jason Elam, Falcons
|
109.3
|
112.0
|
107.0
|
5.0
|
7
|
at MIN
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOW WE ARRIVED AT OUR RANKINGS: The sources for our projections are ESPN and NFL.com's pre-season magazine 2008 statistical projections as well as Sportsline.com.
Stats used for Ks are: FGM (3 pts) and XPM (1 pt). The magazines don't project FGs by yardage (i.e., under 40, 40-49, 50+).
So, for example, if one of the sources projected 25 FGM (75 pts) and 50 XPM (50 pts) for a K in 2008, then the projection from that source for that K would be 125 points (75 + 50).
The process is repeated for each source and for every kicker. The theory is taking several expert opinions into consideration will result in a more meaningful projection.
Our average projection is simply an average of the values from all 3 sources. The High and Low represent the highest and lowest value included in the overall calculation. The range is the difference between the High and Low and is a measure of risk. The greater the range, the larger the difference in expectations for the fantasy player determined by the experts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout the pre-season, we will make adjustments to these baseline projections. Check back for updates.
|
|